Two councillors in code breach (From York Press)
Get in touch: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting YORK to 80360 or send an email»
Bolton Percy parish councillors in code breach
8:41am Tuesday 15th January 2013 in News
By Mike Laycock, Chief reporter
TWO senior parish councillors breached the code of conduct during a debate on affordable housing plans in their village near Tadcaster, an investigation concluded.
Selby District Council’s monitoring office was called in to investigate after complaints were made about Bolton Percy councillors Denise Ford and David Robinson, who were chair and vice-chair of the parish at the time.
Former Selby district councillor Brian Percival and resident Kathleen Rhodes claimed the councillors failed to declare a personal and prejudicial interest when the parish considered the affordable housing proposals for land in Oak Avenue, saying they should have withdrawn from the room and avoided taking part in any discussions or vote.
In letters to them, upholding their complaints, deputy monitoring officer Michelle Sacks said it was clear there had been a significant amount of concern about an attempt by Selby District Council, the Rural Housing Trust and Broadacres Housing Association to identify and develop a small affordable housing scheme.
But she said the strength of those concerns did not set aside the duty of councillors to comply with the code.
She was satisfied the two councillors had a personal and prejudicial interest in the proposal – which they had failed to declare.
In Coun Robinson’s case, he owned and lived in a property in the vicinity of the site and his financial interest would be affected by the development, while Coun Ford was a close personal friend of Coun Robinson.
Mrs Ford said she had resigned from the parish council last year, not because of the findings but because of new rules for declarations of interest which had been introduced, which would have led to personal details going online in an unnecessarily intrusive manner.
She claimed she had felt she did not have to declare an interest over the affordable housing issue because the district had not followed due process.
Coun Robinson, who remains on the parish as vice chair, said he accepted he had made a mistake and should have formally declared an interest, even though other councillors had all known he lived near the site.
He said he had received no training at the time about the code of conduct, although he and other parish councillors had since received such training.
Comments(7)
capt spaulding
says...
10:42am Tue 15 Jan 13
The horses have left the field.
capt spaulding
says...
10:45am Tue 15 Jan 13
They attended the 30min lecture then.
myselby
says...
11:53am Tue 15 Jan 13
They attended the 30min lecture then.”
cup of tea and a chat more like
johnwill
says...
4:17pm Tue 15 Jan 13
baldiebiker
says...
10:10pm Tue 15 Jan 13
Scarlet Pimpernel
says...
3:35pm Thu 17 Jan 13
baldiebiker wrote:Sadly, it is allocated to those most in need, and just because you were born and lived in a village, and cannot afford to buy a house, does not mean that you are more needy than an immigrant or out of work offender, who doesn't live there.
Is affordable housing for the local young persons so that they can stay in the village or is it some where for the drug addicts to be rehoused.
Incidentally, 'affordable housing' is social rented housing.
Mulgrave says...
9:09am Tue 15 Jan 13
I note the 'PC' use of 'chair' in the article, however the legal framework which empowers Parish Councils does not recognise this, they have a chairman irrespective of the holder's gender.