£68k cost of York's Olympic welcome (From York Press)
Get in touch: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting YORK to 80360 or send an email»
£68k cost of York's Olympic welcome
9:38am Wednesday 21st November 2012 in News
By Mark Stead, mark.stead@thepress.co.uk
The Olympic torch passes through the streets of York, carried by Daniel Rodwell
ALMOST £68,000 of public money was spent on welcoming the Olympic torch and Paralympic lantern to York.
Figures released under the Freedom of Information Act show City of York Council paid £39,120 for barriers, road signs, fences and the trackway for the torch and lantern-bearers when the sporting symbols passed through the city this summer.
The authority also spent £8,861 on staffing, stewarding and security and £7,000 to hire facilities at York Racecourse for the culmination of the torch relay on June 19, which saw 23,412 people attend a celebration concert.
A further 55,000 people are estimated to have lined the torch route, with the council saying at the time that city-centre footfall on that day was 25 per cent higher than normal.
The £67,934 bill for both events includes £3,862 for entertainment and other “special activities”, £2,807 on advertising and publicity and £3,024 on first aid, but just £260 was spent on artists’ and performers’ fees.
Sponsors donated £1,600 towards the trackway costs and tourism body Welcome to Yorkshire made a £200 contribution towards staging the York events.
In its response to the FOI request, the council said parking for the finale of the torch relay was provided free at the racecourse and residents and visitors were unable to use St George’s Field car park that day due to the need to accommodate vehicles from LOCOG, the Olympic and Paralympic organising committee.
This meant parking income for the day of the torch event did not rise, and an agreement with LOCOG also “precluded the selling of any advertising space”.
“The benefit to the local community was a programme of schools, community and voluntary sports club activities, two fantastic community events, increases in sports club membership – including a huge rise in disabled sports activity – and two days when the city really buzzed,” said the response.
The council said it did not hold information about the policing costs for the two events. The Press reported last month that North Yorkshire Police could face a £215,000 overtime bill this year, with the cost of providing officers to patrol the torch and lantern processions and the Games themselves contributing to this.
Comments(25)
Sawday2
says...
9:59am Wed 21 Nov 12
pedalling paul
says...
10:02am Wed 21 Nov 12
atorycouncil2014
says...
10:11am Wed 21 Nov 12
pedalling paul wrote:Really. The torch was everywhere sometimes it seems even twice. Any impact it may have had was incredibly diluted. Even on Calendar news it shared the limelight with three other Yorkshire cities. I don't think it even made the national news.
The other side of the debate is that York has had an incredible amount of world wide media exposure, which can only benefit the local economy.
Having the torch for people to see was inspirational for younger generations. Could this have been done without spending £68k. YES
roskoboskovic
says...
10:18am Wed 21 Nov 12
Zetkin
says...
10:51am Wed 21 Nov 12
Nice work if you can get it.
GooseTrackLane
says...
11:20am Wed 21 Nov 12
The Olympics are unlikely to return to the UK within the lifetime of the miserable few who would rather grumble and moan about anything that costs a few quid - so you can all get back to the things you do best: grumbling about cycle lanes and fortnightly bin collections.
jadestars
says...
11:28am Wed 21 Nov 12
GooseTrackLane wrote:Well Said!
While there may have been little long-term benefit, had York refused to welcome the torch, THAT would have made national news and would have had a negative effect on the city. The Olympics are unlikely to return to the UK within the lifetime of the miserable few who would rather grumble and moan about anything that costs a few quid - so you can all get back to the things you do best: grumbling about cycle lanes and fortnightly bin collections.
Von_Dutch
says...
12:07pm Wed 21 Nov 12
Seriously though, this was a once in a lifetime thing (albeit a bit of an anticlimax). I'll never see another olympic torch relay in York. I really don't begrudge my tax going on this and £68K isn't all that bad in my view for a well known city such as ours.
NoNewsIsGoodNews
says...
12:17pm Wed 21 Nov 12
GooseTrackLane says...
11:20am Wed 21 Nov 12
While there may have been little long-term benefit, had York refused to welcome the torch, THAT would have made national news and would have had a negative effect on the city.
That makes it sound like we were blackmailed into having the torch.
I for one was pleased to have experienced seeing the torch pass through York.
Jackanory2
says...
12:43pm Wed 21 Nov 12
Hicarrumba
says...
12:49pm Wed 21 Nov 12
clockwatcher
says...
12:59pm Wed 21 Nov 12
xtc
says...
1:31pm Wed 21 Nov 12
Sawday2 wrote:Yeah good to see they re carrying on the good work,wasting our cash on that what next eh?.
Good to see that the Council is not wasting money.
beretta
says...
1:56pm Wed 21 Nov 12
Von_Dutch wrote:£68,000 isn't that bad I agree, But £68,000 would have given 3 men jobs for a year, that sounds like £68,000 better spent to me.
If the Lord Almighty (if such a thing existed) were to descend from the heavens into York City Centre to grant residents everlasting peace and joy, i'm sure people on here would just whinge about the disruption to traffic flow and waste of council tax payers money to police the thing... Seriously though, this was a once in a lifetime thing (albeit a bit of an anticlimax). I'll never see another olympic torch relay in York. I really don't begrudge my tax going on this and £68K isn't all that bad in my view for a well known city such as ours.
gmc_1963
says...
2:01pm Wed 21 Nov 12
Stop moaning
TerryYork
says...
2:22pm Wed 21 Nov 12
I know which one meant the most to me and it wasn't the joggers.
SamYCFC
says...
4:53pm Wed 21 Nov 12
Stop moaning.
CaroleBaines
says...
6:29pm Wed 21 Nov 12
pedalling paul wrote:Absolutely right. Always makes me laugh how people fall for these Press attempts to stir up outrage. Dangle some pretty, uncontextualised figures in front of some people and they go for it every time. York needs to host events, this will cost some pounds and some pence. Get over it
The other side of the debate is that York has had an incredible amount of world wide media exposure, which can only benefit the local economy.
CaroleBaines
says...
6:32pm Wed 21 Nov 12
TerryYork wrote:I very much doubt nothing. Staffing, police, bollards,barriers, traffic diverting. Was there not a buffet after too? Joggers to you maybe but YCFC are pigs bladder kickers to others. Go with the flow, we all like different things.
Yet over 10,000 saw York City's double success parade and that cost nothing.
I know which one meant the most to me and it wasn't the joggers.
I'mALaydee
says...
7:28pm Wed 21 Nov 12
SamYCFC wrote:I agree. This was a once in a lifetime thing for most people. My family and I thoroughly enjoyed it and won't ever forget it and you can't put a price on that. Stop whining!
Stop putting a cost on everything. just enjoy these great occasions.
Stop moaning.
I'mALaydee
says...
7:28pm Wed 21 Nov 12
SamYCFC wrote:I agree. This was a once in a lifetime thing for most people. My family and I thoroughly enjoyed it and won't ever forget it and you can't put a price on that. Stop whining!
Stop putting a cost on everything. just enjoy these great occasions.
Stop moaning.
fear your government
says...
8:26pm Wed 21 Nov 12
see it for what it really is.
Kelly Smunt
says...
7:07am Thu 22 Nov 12
However, I'm sure it wouldn't take many people to get sufficiently inspired to adopt a healthier lifestyle and take some exercise to realise a saving. How much is spent on health costs in York for self inflicted ailments due to lack of exercise, smoking and lumps of lard stuffing junk food down their bloated necks?
Justanotheropinion
says...
2:46pm Thu 22 Nov 12
bob the builder says...
9:44am Wed 21 Nov 12