Second skeleton found at Richard III site

A second skeleton found by archaeologists searching for the remains of Richard III, the last Yorkist king of England, could be that of a friary’s female founder.

The team carrying out the dig under the car park in Leicester city centre, which is thought to have been the site of the monarch’s last resting place at the Church of Grey Friars, have not yet examined the second set of remains.

The team is also analysing a set of human bones, believed to belong to Richard III, the last Plantagenet king, who was killed at the Battle of Bosworth Field in 1485. The king had wanted to be buried at York Minster.

The bones caused a row between MPs in the House of Commons – with a handful vying for them to be housed in their constituencies.

York Central MP Hugh Bayley, Labour MP John Mann (Bassetlaw) and Labour colleague Jon Ashworth (Leicester South) have openly bid for the monarch’s remains – if tests prove they are his.

The University of Leicester, in association with Leicester City Council and the Richard III Society, is leading the search for the remains of Richard III.

The outcome of the investigation is expected in January.

Comments(6)

Ignatius Lumpopo says...
10:42am Wed 31 Oct 12

Female? A shame. I thought it might have been Richard IV (now that WOULD have been a discovery)...

Ignatius Lumpopo says...
11:51am Wed 31 Oct 12

... or perhaps Richard III Part 2.

MarkyMarkMark says...
4:57pm Wed 31 Oct 12

Ignatius Lumpopo, you beat me to it!

Rich Tea says...
11:55pm Wed 31 Oct 12

York has more than enough history to be going at. I think (whoever the bones belong to) that he/she and their consort should be buried in Leicester (like they already were) or moved to Lancaster ;-)

RingoStarr says...
4:08pm Thu 1 Nov 12

Did they find it under the first one?

jgycfc says...
11:50pm Thu 1 Nov 12

"The bones caused a row between MPs in the House of Commons"... Did the shocking amateur that wrote this tiny article-ette actually bother to read the transcript?

It was unbelievably amicable, unless there's been an actual row since?

Was it because you weren't allowed a Daily mail-esque sensationalist headline that you thought you'd beef up this story with "anger" as opposed to anything of note.

You get a U grade for this awful waste of print space / web space.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree