MP makes floods insurance appeal to Government

A YORK MP has called on the Government to ensure residents whose homes are flooded get prompt advice and to put pressure on insurance firms to pay up quickly.

Hugh Bayley, who represents York Central, raised his concerns about the “human cost” of last month’s floods in the city with Environment Minister Richard Benyon, having visited homes and businesses which were affected with City of York Council leader James Alexander.

He asked Mr Benyon to give the Environment Agency responsibility for providing a package of advice to those hit by floods and to press for swifter compensation.

He said: “Insurance companies should make interim payments quickly because flood victims face immediate costs renting alternative homes, and businesses need money so staff can continue to be paid and damaged goods can be replaced.”

Mr Bayley and Coun Alexander are organising a public meeting with an Environment Agency representative so people who were affected by flooding can raise issues. It will be held on Saturday, November 17, at 10am at the Novotel in Fishergate.

Comments(5)

anistasia says...
9:06am Tue 30 Oct 12

firstly make sure people who are in a postcode area that has never had a flood don't pay extra insurance for something they don't need the environmental agency need better maps markings.peopl who do get flooded should get help asap as stated but the cost of insurance must be kept to a minimum rise after a claim.someone on tv after a claim for flooding their next years premium rose by over £1000. People/companies find it hard enough without the extra cost.

Jiffy says...
2:50pm Tue 30 Oct 12

anistasia wrote:
firstly make sure people who are in a postcode area that has never had a flood don't pay extra insurance for something they don't need the environmental agency need better maps markings.peopl who do get flooded should get help asap as stated but the cost of insurance must be kept to a minimum rise after a claim.someone on tv after a claim for flooding their next years premium rose by over £1000. People/companies find it hard enough without the extra cost.
Well said Anistasia.

They could also do to be pressing employers to be more understanding of staff whose homes are under threat and do indeed flood as I suspect there will be many who do not get paid if absent from work during a flooding situation or what they class as a flooding situation.

It is debateable quite how well an individual will perform at work with their mind on whether or not there home is under water and not being able to be on the ground - so to speak - to be advised by the authorities what is happening and keep an eye on levels themselves.

All well & good being advised by the Envronment Agency by text/e-mail & phone call that flooding is imminent & that evacuations will be carried out but this is not of much use if you are at work & unable to get home to turn off gas/electricity/sort out pets etc because you cannot afford to lose pay!

AnotherPointofView says...
5:46pm Tue 30 Oct 12

anistasia wrote:
firstly make sure people who are in a postcode area that has never had a flood don't pay extra insurance for something they don't need the environmental agency need better maps markings.peopl who do get flooded should get help asap as stated but the cost of insurance must be kept to a minimum rise after a claim.someone on tv after a claim for flooding their next years premium rose by over £1000. People/companies find it hard enough without the extra cost.
Insurance is about risk. If a house floods once, then it follows that in the same circumstances it WILL flood again.

Why should an insurance company not increase the premiums comensurate with the risk?

The homeowner may not like it that the premiums are being increased by a large amount but why should the insurance company "buy a claim". They aren't charities but companies who have to return a profit for their shareholders.

anistasia says...
6:16pm Tue 30 Oct 12

you hit the nail on the head money for shareholders no one should make money out of a crisis i agree some premiums will go up but not by such an amount.i was classed in a postcode flood area and i lived in a second floor flat noway i would get flooded.and huntington road in york some houses do flood but on park grove side of huntington road i have never seen them flood in all my years in york.and if prices keep going up people won't be able to afford insurance in the first place.if most people stopped buying insurance for 1 or 2 years the industry would have to do something.you should be able to claim once every 3-5 years without affecting premiums and each claim free year get further reductions in premiums.

meme says...
9:27am Wed 31 Oct 12

If you choose to live in an area which floods because you like the view or similar then you pay the price of higher insurance and problems when it does flood.
Insurance companies should be able to charge a premium commensurate with the risk and in this case its easily identifiable what floods and what does not
No body buys a house nowadays without knowing the flood risk and i suspect those with major flooding issues are cheaper in the first place
This is not supposed to be a nanny state. What I object to is those of us paying higher premiums to susidise those who take irresponsible decisions to live where it does flood and then moan about insurance costs....!

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree