News RSS Feed


Holgate land sell-off row

12:27pm Monday 12th May 2008

comment Comments (3)   Have your say »

By Jeremy Small »

OPPOSITION councillors will today try to stop a slice of York land that is set aside for leisure provision from possibly being sold to make way for residential development.

City of York Council's approved capital programme shows the Balfour Street frontage of Back Park, in Holgate, as a possible sale site for housing after 2009.

City of York councillor Sonja Crisp, who represents Holgate ward, proposed at a budget meeting of the authority in February that the possible sale of the section of land be removed from the programme.

But Coun Crisp's proposal was defeated, and Labour councillors took the decision to "call-in" the authority's executive decision to designate the area of land as a possible sale site for housing after 2009.

Coun Crisp said: "The calling-in procedure allows three or more councillors to refer a decision of the ruling party to a cross party meeting for further consideration. This mechanism is used sparingly, but in this case we felt the executive had not taken the correct decision to remove the site from the saleable capital list, nor had it halted the investigation into the legal title on the land."

Coun David Scott, leader of the Labour Group on the council, said: "The setting of Back Park is such that any removal of open space can be considered wholly inappropriate. Residents value what little space they have and to sell it for further development is insensitive not only to their wishes, but to common sense urban planning policy."

The issue was due to be discussed at a meeting of the authority's scrutiny management committee (calling in) today. Outgoing council leader Coun Steve Galloway said: "The Balfour Street frontage site is not even scheduled for consideration before 2009.

"The executive have asked officers to review all council land holdings in the Leeman Road area and this will of course include consideration of any restrictive covenants which may prevent an improvement scheme being implemented."

Your Say YourPress

Cruddass is a muppett, says...
6:22pm Mon 12 May 08

Greedy, greedy pigs selling off things which dont belong to them. AGAIN.

petethefeet, York says...
9:52pm Mon 12 May 08

I'm not an expert in law but somewhere about 1986 (I think) the rules concerning restrictive covenants changed. Up until then, the persons who laid the covenant, or their heirs could enforce that covenant for time immemorial. The law change allowed the current owner to appeal to a tribunal to have the covenant set aside on the grounds that the maintenance of the covenat was "too onerous". Tricky!

There is a case for the above so long as the tribunal, and those that seek it's interdiction realise, that to use it in blind disregard of the consequences will ensure that forever, people will be less likely to do such good deeds as to leave assets for the public good.


OldFart, York says...
12:38am Tue 13 May 08

Back Park...was gifted to the city by Arnold Stephenson Rowntree in 1911

In perpetuity I assume? And it's not their's to sell, but ours. I really hope that some covenenant or other legal means is found to prevent this pillaging. I do believe that our esteemed Council would sell their Grandmother's ashes if they thought there was a profit in it. Shame on them! Will someone please vote with me to remove these clowns at the next elections?

Your sayYourPress

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE York Press account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.




Forgotten your password?

Hot Jobs

Your Local Services


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Sponsored Adverts By Yahoo