The NHS is slipping through Tory fingers (From York Press)
Get in touch: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting YORK to 80360 or send an email»
The NHS is slipping through Tory fingers
11:36am Thursday 27th September 2012 in Letters By Readers' letters
Do you remember David Cameron’s pledge at the 2010 General Election?
He promised “the NHS is safe in our hands” and posters claimed “I’ll cut the deficit, not the NHS.”
Yet here we are two years later and we see NHS North Yorkshire and York carrying out £10 million of cuts, which will directly affect front-line services (NHS cuts to save £10m, September 26).
The Tories may have been technically correct when they claimed that they would not cut the budget, but as a result of the unnecessary root and branch restructuring of the NHS, costing hundreds of millions of pounds, we are facing cuts to front line services.
Cuts which the people of York and North Yorkshire will see in their GP surgeries, hospitals and already stretched mental health services.
When Labour left office in 2010 public satisfaction with the NHS was at record levels. I fear that by the next general election in 2015 we will be back to the level of service we saw during the last Tory Government. I doubt the NHS will ever be safe in Conservative hands.
Andrew Collingwood, Main Street, Elvington .
• It seems that when the new system of doctors running our Yorkshire NHS begins, they will be saddled with an enormous debt run up by the present Primary Care Trust.
Should we not be able to expect expect the Coalition to wipe out the debt and give the new management at least a level playing field?
Who will be blamed if they have to make large cuts to eventually balance the books because of inherited debt?
Dennis Barton, Woodthorpe , York.
Comments(17)
Zetkin
says...
12:13pm Thu 27 Sep 12
bolero
says...
12:25pm Thu 27 Sep 12
Scarlet Pimpernel
says...
1:11pm Thu 27 Sep 12
The Great Buda wrote:Labour broke it by allowing net immigration of 3m into the country between 1997 and 2010. The open door policy they allowed is still seeing hundreds of thousands coming into this country, putting ever increasing pressure on the NHS and housing.
The Government needs to be able to sell the public the idea that the NHS is "broken", then they can carve it up it for their mates to get richer off.
Maquis
says...
3:22pm Thu 27 Sep 12
Now that banks wont lend them even more, they have to reduce their spending.
They get more from the government than ever before, but they have to learn how to spend their money properly.
In other words the "cuts" are only taking it back to what should have been able to afford anyway.
Its like if you used to earn £200 per week and go shopping every week, spending £300 on your credit card. At some point it has to stop. You still earn £200 and can spend it (except for loan repayments) so they are not cut backs, just not spending what you dont have anymore.
CHISSY1
says...
3:55pm Thu 27 Sep 12
Scarlet Pimpernel wrote:Not to mention the billions that we throw abroad every year.But that's this country, top up everyone's begging bowl and we have to suffer.
The Great Buda wrote:Labour broke it by allowing net immigration of 3m into the country between 1997 and 2010. The open door policy they allowed is still seeing hundreds of thousands coming into this country, putting ever increasing pressure on the NHS and housing.
The Government needs to be able to sell the public the idea that the NHS is "broken", then they can carve it up it for their mates to get richer off.
yorkshirelad
says...
11:00pm Thu 27 Sep 12
The Great Buda wrote:Absolutely. Creating public dissatisfaction is all part of the plan for privatisation.
The Government needs to be able to sell the public the idea that the NHS is "broken", then they can carve it up it for their mates to get richer off.
'Make them fed up with it so, in the end, they all go private'.
Witness the relentless attacks on the NHS from the Daily Mail over the last few years.
People moan now, but they will rue the day when destruction is complete. By then it will be too late to turn back the clock and our healthcare will be run, for profit, by multinational corporations - one eay or another we will pay for those profits.
The jibes above about NHS funding miss the fact that under governments before Labour the NHS had been underfunded for years. So 'it's all Labour's fault' is wearing a bit thin...we're not daft and know Labour wasn't also running Spain, Greece, Ireland, Portugal, USA, Iceland, Italy.....
Magicman!
says...
2:43am Fri 28 Sep 12
CHISSY1 wrote:Charity begins at home... we're paying an inordinate sum of money to India for example, and yet they have their own space programme - they obviously have no clue where they should be directing money so why should we be taking care of all their poor whilst we have millions in poverty and their government is trying to send a rocket to the moon?
Scarlet Pimpernel wrote:Not to mention the billions that we throw abroad every year.But that's this country, top up everyone's begging bowl and we have to suffer.
The Great Buda wrote:Labour broke it by allowing net immigration of 3m into the country between 1997 and 2010. The open door policy they allowed is still seeing hundreds of thousands coming into this country, putting ever increasing pressure on the NHS and housing.
The Government needs to be able to sell the public the idea that the NHS is "broken", then they can carve it up it for their mates to get richer off.
We all knew the tories would try and privatise the NHS, it's what the tories do... they did it with Coal, Gas, Electricity, Water, Sewage, buses, trains, north sea oil... the NHS is next, and cameron is also laying the foundations so that when they next get into power they can privatise the main road network.
Omega Point
says...
3:49am Fri 28 Sep 12
CHISSY1 wrote:Foreign aid works to our advantage. It is not charity, it is an instrument of foreign policy. Cheap at the price but hey do not expect some to understand it. To the thick, why do all parties keep it going?
Scarlet Pimpernel wrote:Not to mention the billions that we throw abroad every year.But that's this country, top up everyone's begging bowl and we have to suffer.The Great Buda wrote: The Government needs to be able to sell the public the idea that the NHS is "broken", then they can carve it up it for their mates to get richer off.Labour broke it by allowing net immigration of 3m into the country between 1997 and 2010. The open door policy they allowed is still seeing hundreds of thousands coming into this country, putting ever increasing pressure on the NHS and housing.
CHISSY1
says...
7:32am Fri 28 Sep 12
Omega Point wrote:"Another brainwashed individual."Foreign aid works to our advantage","an instrument of foreign policy". Explain this drivel to all the thick people please.
CHISSY1 wrote:Foreign aid works to our advantage. It is not charity, it is an instrument of foreign policy. Cheap at the price but hey do not expect some to understand it. To the thick, why do all parties keep it going?
Scarlet Pimpernel wrote:Not to mention the billions that we throw abroad every year.But that's this country, top up everyone's begging bowl and we have to suffer.The Great Buda wrote: The Government needs to be able to sell the public the idea that the NHS is "broken", then they can carve it up it for their mates to get richer off.Labour broke it by allowing net immigration of 3m into the country between 1997 and 2010. The open door policy they allowed is still seeing hundreds of thousands coming into this country, putting ever increasing pressure on the NHS and housing.
bolero
says...
8:45am Fri 28 Sep 12
Omega Point wrote:I'm thick Omega, so please explain will you.
CHISSY1 wrote:Foreign aid works to our advantage. It is not charity, it is an instrument of foreign policy. Cheap at the price but hey do not expect some to understand it. To the thick, why do all parties keep it going?Scarlet Pimpernel wrote:Not to mention the billions that we throw abroad every year.But that's this country, top up everyone's begging bowl and we have to suffer.The Great Buda wrote: The Government needs to be able to sell the public the idea that the NHS is "broken", then they can carve it up it for their mates to get richer off.Labour broke it by allowing net immigration of 3m into the country between 1997 and 2010. The open door policy they allowed is still seeing hundreds of thousands coming into this country, putting ever increasing pressure on the NHS and housing.
YSTClinguist
says...
2:22pm Fri 28 Sep 12
Maquis wrote:Still got people using the home finances explanation I see. Families can't spend money to make more money though, can they? Job creation, training, industry, etc.
Satisfaction was at an all time high because during Labour's Years in power they maxed out the credit card, effectively mortgaged everything to the hilt with PFI, spent every penny that they could get their hands on and then more.
Now that banks wont lend them even more, they have to reduce their spending.
They get more from the government than ever before, but they have to learn how to spend their money properly.
In other words the "cuts" are only taking it back to what should have been able to afford anyway.
Its like if you used to earn £200 per week and go shopping every week, spending £300 on your credit card. At some point it has to stop. You still earn £200 and can spend it (except for loan repayments) so they are not cut backs, just not spending what you dont have anymore.
Likewise, those who cannot understand how spending abroad bring profits back at home ought to look at the British Council model, which data shows brings in £4 for every £1 of tax payers money spent through it.
"Tax" Got to be raised again hasn't it? Corporations that take British tax payers money and pull it out of the country to shove through another EU countries lower tax system and then report that back to our government is a major issue for the man on the street. Start focusing there, instead of attacking immigrants, claimants and using the household finances appalling analogy.
CHISSY1
says...
4:13pm Fri 28 Sep 12
YSTClinguist wrote:"Brainwashed"
Maquis wrote:Still got people using the home finances explanation I see. Families can't spend money to make more money though, can they? Job creation, training, industry, etc.
Satisfaction was at an all time high because during Labour's Years in power they maxed out the credit card, effectively mortgaged everything to the hilt with PFI, spent every penny that they could get their hands on and then more.
Now that banks wont lend them even more, they have to reduce their spending.
They get more from the government than ever before, but they have to learn how to spend their money properly.
In other words the "cuts" are only taking it back to what should have been able to afford anyway.
Its like if you used to earn £200 per week and go shopping every week, spending £300 on your credit card. At some point it has to stop. You still earn £200 and can spend it (except for loan repayments) so they are not cut backs, just not spending what you dont have anymore.
Likewise, those who cannot understand how spending abroad bring profits back at home ought to look at the British Council model, which data shows brings in £4 for every £1 of tax payers money spent through it.
"Tax" Got to be raised again hasn't it? Corporations that take British tax payers money and pull it out of the country to shove through another EU countries lower tax system and then report that back to our government is a major issue for the man on the street. Start focusing there, instead of attacking immigrants, claimants and using the household finances appalling analogy.
Maquis
says...
2:56am Sat 29 Sep 12
YSTClinguist wrote:It is not the job of the NHS to make money, it is their job to use our money wisely.
Maquis wrote:Still got people using the home finances explanation I see. Families can't spend money to make more money though, can they? Job creation, training, industry, etc.
Satisfaction was at an all time high because during Labour's Years in power they maxed out the credit card, effectively mortgaged everything to the hilt with PFI, spent every penny that they could get their hands on and then more.
Now that banks wont lend them even more, they have to reduce their spending.
They get more from the government than ever before, but they have to learn how to spend their money properly.
In other words the "cuts" are only taking it back to what should have been able to afford anyway.
Its like if you used to earn £200 per week and go shopping every week, spending £300 on your credit card. At some point it has to stop. You still earn £200 and can spend it (except for loan repayments) so they are not cut backs, just not spending what you dont have anymore.
Likewise, those who cannot understand how spending abroad bring profits back at home ought to look at the British Council model, which data shows brings in £4 for every £1 of tax payers money spent through it.
"Tax" Got to be raised again hasn't it? Corporations that take British tax payers money and pull it out of the country to shove through another EU countries lower tax system and then report that back to our government is a major issue for the man on the street. Start focusing there, instead of attacking immigrants, claimants and using the household finances appalling analogy.
They massive overspend was not abroad, it was here.
If you look at my comment, I didnt mention immigrants at all, simply the inability for some NHS bosses to work within the budgets given to them, but since you mention it, a vastly disproportionate amount of children being born now are to immigrant families, and the problem of "NHS tourists" does need to be addresses.
Maquis
says...
2:58am Sat 29 Sep 12
YSTClinguist wrote:It is not the job of the NHS to make money, it is their job to use our money wisely.
Maquis wrote:Still got people using the home finances explanation I see. Families can't spend money to make more money though, can they? Job creation, training, industry, etc.
Satisfaction was at an all time high because during Labour's Years in power they maxed out the credit card, effectively mortgaged everything to the hilt with PFI, spent every penny that they could get their hands on and then more.
Now that banks wont lend them even more, they have to reduce their spending.
They get more from the government than ever before, but they have to learn how to spend their money properly.
In other words the "cuts" are only taking it back to what should have been able to afford anyway.
Its like if you used to earn £200 per week and go shopping every week, spending £300 on your credit card. At some point it has to stop. You still earn £200 and can spend it (except for loan repayments) so they are not cut backs, just not spending what you dont have anymore.
Likewise, those who cannot understand how spending abroad bring profits back at home ought to look at the British Council model, which data shows brings in £4 for every £1 of tax payers money spent through it.
"Tax" Got to be raised again hasn't it? Corporations that take British tax payers money and pull it out of the country to shove through another EU countries lower tax system and then report that back to our government is a major issue for the man on the street. Start focusing there, instead of attacking immigrants, claimants and using the household finances appalling analogy.
They massive overspend was not abroad, it was here.
If you look at my comment, I didnt mention immigrants at all, simply the inability for some NHS bosses to work within the budgets given to them, but since you mention it, a vastly disproportionate amount of children being born now are to immigrant families, and the problem of "NHS tourists" does need to be addresses.
Mr Happy
says...
10:32am Sat 29 Sep 12
CHISSY1
says...
11:30am Sat 29 Sep 12
Mr Happy wrote:"I just say what the majority of people in this country think.The brainwashed are the people who believe what MPs tell them.Notice that the majority of comments that are posted on this subject are politically influenced,i am not.
I wish you'd stop telling everyone that you're brainwashed CHISSY1. We already know!
The Great Buda says...
11:46am Thu 27 Sep 12