Attack on the poorest (From York Press)
Get in touch: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting YORK to 80360 or send an email»
Attack on the poorest
8:39am Monday 24th September 2012 in Letters By Reader's letter
IN A week where there seems to be a consensus that a benefit freeze will be implemented for the next two or three years, it seems as though many have missed that the reality will be a cut in disposable income, with the localization of council tax benefit and the social fund.
A cursory glance at the consultations from many local authorities show projected across the board cuts of 15 per cent to 30 per cent in council tax benefit, resulting in a single person in a Band A property needing to find an extra £4 per week; the equivalent of a five per cent cut for a single person in receipt of Jobseeker’s Allowance.
The localisation of council tax benefit and the social fund (when local authorities will be provided with a sum equivalent to 2005 levels and not ring-fenced) is one of the most skilful yet deceitful pieces of legislation brought in by the coalition, as no doubt it will be the local authorities who carry the can for what will be yet another vicious attack on the poorest and lowest paid in society.
RKM Bridge, Holgate Road, York.
Comments(4)
The Great Buda
says...
11:02am Mon 24 Sep 12
Jezreel
says...
12:25pm Mon 24 Sep 12
They hold the poor the unemployed, and even working families in contempt. We will pay for the sub-prime scandal and the banker led recession.
YSTClinguist
says...
6:25pm Mon 24 Sep 12
Basically, low wage families in a city like London with high housing costs, commuting costs and childcare are up the creek. Astonishingly, it won't pay to work in a lot of circumstances! It suggests a single parent ought to work no more than 16hrs a week, and in a family with two minimum wage earners, it's only worth one working.
Yes, the report covers London, but the costs of living in York are high, a spike that even Hugh Bayley has been trying to fight with the welfare minister, with the initial response being that minimum wage earning families ought to be transported to Selby, Tadcaster or Malton and commute in.
Zetkin says...
10:44am Mon 24 Sep 12