Let residents decide

I WRITE with regard to the 20mph concept proposed by the council’s Labour group.

I ask, would it not be best to go with a speed limit decided after consultation with local people, be that a call for pedestrianisation or a 40mph?

It may be that many residents in York want a 20 mile-per-hour limit. However, many will not.

It is downright presumptuous of the Labour group to consider that many residents will want a 20mph limit when many may want no cars, far slower cars or in fact accept that, on some routes, modern-day life requires reasonably rapid transport.

One size never fits all.

Richard Hill, Scarborough Terrace, York.
 

• RECENT coverage shows Labour’s confusion over 20mph speed limits.

Their cabinet member for transport claims that “each road is considered individually, rather than a simple blanket approach covering all roads” (The Press, August 27). This is the policy of the Liberal Democrats.

However, your editorial rightly says Labour’s policy is to impose blanket 20mph speed limits across the city (The Press, August 31).

Another Labour councillor claims residents support 20mph limits, with 75 per cent on one road agreeing with the proposals in a consultation.

However, a closer look shows that only 24 per cent of residents in the area responded, suggested 18.5 per cent favoured the proposals.

Now a respected former police accident investigator questions Labour’s plan and your paper calls for them to assess limits road-by-road.

Norman Baker, Lib Dem Transport Minister, said recently that 20mph limits were useful in certain residential where it can be shown they benefit road safety and quality of life.

Crucially, he added: “It’s vital speed limits are suitable for local conditions and councils are best placed to determine what these limits are, based on local knowledge and the views of the community.”

Coun Ann Reid (Lib Dem), Grassholme, Woodthorpe , York.

Comments(3)

skepticreader says...
9:21pm Mon 10 Sep 12

Councillor Reid is on shaky ground claiming that those who did not take part in a survey shpuld be assumed to have 'voted' against a motion. What would happen to politics?
Then she goes on to quote that "councils are best placed to determine" the speed limit, but is apparently happy to contradict this by objecting to the current councils decision.

ColdAsChristmas says...
1:26pm Tue 11 Sep 12

'Let residents decide?' Surely that would be far to democratic for CoYC.
As for Norman Baker, I wouldn't trust him as fare as I could throw him.
(The man has form for not listening to and acting on genuine public concern)

greenmonkey says...
8:20am Mon 17 Sep 12

'a respected former police accident investigator'... who later made a living defending motorists from insurance claims, including a locally reported fatal collision with a cyclist. One might question how impartial a view he would have of an accident reduction measures when his work depended on taking the motorists 'side'? A bit like asking a drinks company to comment on lowering drink driving limit.
As for suggesting it might be more dangerous to be hit by a vehicle at lower speed (!) this ignores the fact that driving more slowly will reduce the likelihood of any impact at all!

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree