Letters RSS Feed


Dogs are blamed for deteriorating York’s lampposts

Street  lighting engineer Ricky Watson with a new batch of lampposts at the City of York Council’s depot in James Street Street lighting engineer Ricky Watson with a new batch of lampposts at the City of York Council’s depot in James Street

DOGS spending a penny have left roads bosses spending a fortune – because the animals’ urine is destroying York’s lampposts.

A survey of the city’s streetlights has found many are in danger of falling over – and dogs are partly to blame.

City of York Council said dog urine was one of several things that can cause corrosion at the base of both steel and concrete lampposts.

Salt spread during winter gritting was also a factor, while gardeners can destabilise the columns by strimming grass near the bases.

The council is having to replace 80 street lights a year, at a cost of £1,000 a time and taxpayers will be footing the bill for years.

Andy Binner, the authority’s head of highway infrastructure, said planned testing, coupled with visual inspections, had shown a large number of lampposts needed replaced “immediately or within the next three years”.

He said: “The replacement of unsound columns continues to put huge pressure on the street lighting budgets and will continue to do so for a number of years.”

Ann Reid, the council’s executive member for neighbourhood services, said: “They basically have a lifespan and each year some become unstable. We cannot afford to replace on spec, so we have to do the testing and replace them from a limited replacement budget as and when we can.”

She said several years ago some lampposts had become so unstable that they could be pushed over by children, but that the problem was no longer so severe.

Coun Reid will consider a report into the issue at a meeting at Guildhall at 4pm on March 24.

Comments(35)

Robert Davro says...
8:56am Tue 16 Mar 10

Let the dog owners pay for the new ones

dodgydave says...
9:00am Tue 16 Mar 10

They're taking the Pi**!

Yorkshire Volunteer says...
9:04am Tue 16 Mar 10

So, it's dog owners - makes a change from blaming smokers for everything, or motorists .....

..... or after perhaps reading this they will add them tothe list?

Come on! Give us credit for some intelligence - things just wear out !

WA Boy says...
9:14am Tue 16 Mar 10

Why dont York council boffins use none corrosive metal for the posts....or is it me thats an idiot ?

Taken for a Mug says...
9:16am Tue 16 Mar 10

I thought that was the idea of usining galvanised lampost i.e they don't corrode??

Jam tomorrow says...
9:25am Tue 16 Mar 10

It sounds to me like the lamp posts were not fit for purpose in the first place or have had no maintenance since they were originally erected.
All of the above problems are what a normal European lamp post should be designed to withstand.

sciencefan says...
9:46am Tue 16 Mar 10

Sounds to me like CYC blaming everyone else for their lack of proper and timely maintenance. Sounds to me like a senior member of council staff failing to do their job and then blaming "budgets".

Why can't we have a competent council?

Silver says...
9:46am Tue 16 Mar 10

What company sells lamp posts to councils that doesn't check to see if the obvious side effects of things like rain, grit and even dog pee have an effect on them? Seriously bad research, yes things do wear out but it's not like these things are meant to be replaced every year. Someone didn't do their homework.

Geoffers says...
9:47am Tue 16 Mar 10

Dogs have been peeing against lamposts since the first gas street lamp was erected!
Why isn't dog urine resistance part of the spec?

jez b says...
10:33am Tue 16 Mar 10

sciencefan wrote:
Sounds to me like CYC blaming everyone else for their lack of proper and timely maintenance. Sounds to me like a senior member of council staff failing to do their job and then blaming "budgets". Why can't we have a competent council?
Well said, Lib Dem CYC and competent don't really go together though.

Garrowby Turnoff says...
11:11am Tue 16 Mar 10

Are they sure it's not racegoers?

AngryandFrustrated says...
12:02pm Tue 16 Mar 10

jez b wrote:
sciencefan wrote: Sounds to me like CYC blaming everyone else for their lack of proper and timely maintenance. Sounds to me like a senior member of council staff failing to do their job and then blaming "budgets". Why can't we have a competent council?
Well said, Lib Dem CYC and competent don't really go together though.
Well said!

As for solving the problem, and working on the assumption that galvanised lamp posts are as rare as hen's teeth (because surely no council could buy posts that were not fit for purpose, could they?!!!), the problem needs to be solved.

Perhaps as a way to reduce the budget deficit the Lib Dums keep moaning about, the Executive could volunteer themselves, strictly on a rota basis of course, to stand at selected dog walking points around York - the dog walkers of this fair city, upon payment of a small fee, could then avoid the lamp posts and head straight for the designated official, thereby alleviating some of the stress caused to said damaged lamp-posts whilst at the same time raising money for the council coffers.

The citizens of this city, who have been p****d on for years by this great council could then have a small element of revenge, whilst raising money for public services!!

yorknights says...
12:24pm Tue 16 Mar 10

I'd buy a dog especially if "angry and frustated" got their way!

BL2 says...
12:26pm Tue 16 Mar 10

AngryandFrustrated wrote:
jez b wrote:
sciencefan wrote: Sounds to me like CYC blaming everyone else for their lack of proper and timely maintenance. Sounds to me like a senior member of council staff failing to do their job and then blaming "budgets". Why can't we have a competent council?
Well said, Lib Dem CYC and competent don't really go together though.
Well said!

As for solving the problem, and working on the assumption that galvanised lamp posts are as rare as hen's teeth (because surely no council could buy posts that were not fit for purpose, could they?!!!), the problem needs to be solved.

Perhaps as a way to reduce the budget deficit the Lib Dums keep moaning about, the Executive could volunteer themselves, strictly on a rota basis of course, to stand at selected dog walking points around York - the dog walkers of this fair city, upon payment of a small fee, could then avoid the lamp posts and head straight for the designated official, thereby alleviating some of the stress caused to said damaged lamp-posts whilst at the same time raising money for the council coffers.

The citizens of this city, who have been p****d on for years by this great council could then have a small element of revenge, whilst raising money for public services!!
Maybe you could extend this to York residents - that would solve the problems of Yorks public toilets! :-)

invisibleman says...
12:54pm Tue 16 Mar 10

Even if the lamposts are galvenised, when exposed to conditions that could result in the galvanised coating being chipped off, such as lawnmowers and gritting, the steel underneath won't stand a chance. In the old days lamposts where made from cast iron, which is a lot less corrosive than rolled mild steel plate, but most of these where probably taken away during the war. The best and safest answer is to use the new aluminium collapsable lamposts, but they are very expensive - although £1000 for a lampost is a bit shocking (unless it includes labour charges for erection)

Silver says...
12:58pm Tue 16 Mar 10

invisibleman wrote:
Even if the lamposts are galvenised, when exposed to conditions that could result in the galvanised coating being chipped off, such as lawnmowers and gritting, the steel underneath won't stand a chance. In the old days lamposts where made from cast iron, which is a lot less corrosive than rolled mild steel plate, but most of these where probably taken away during the war. The best and safest answer is to use the new aluminium collapsable lamposts, but they are very expensive - although £1000 for a lampost is a bit shocking (unless it includes labour charges for erection)
£1000 but if you buy it and it last 20 years. Thats only £50 a year which I find rather cheap.

invisibleman says...
1:04pm Tue 16 Mar 10

Silver wrote:
invisibleman wrote: Even if the lamposts are galvenised, when exposed to conditions that could result in the galvanised coating being chipped off, such as lawnmowers and gritting, the steel underneath won't stand a chance. In the old days lamposts where made from cast iron, which is a lot less corrosive than rolled mild steel plate, but most of these where probably taken away during the war. The best and safest answer is to use the new aluminium collapsable lamposts, but they are very expensive - although £1000 for a lampost is a bit shocking (unless it includes labour charges for erection)
£1000 but if you buy it and it last 20 years. Thats only £50 a year which I find rather cheap.
Yeah I guess so, still a grand for a bit of steel tubing with a wire through it and a light fitting on top.

Ghost of Oscar Deutsch says...
1:11pm Tue 16 Mar 10

Who studies this? Must be a great career choice..

'And what do you do for a living?
'Well I study the effect of dog urine on lamp post deterioration!'

I think some external consultant is having them on.

What are these dogs p*issing? Sulphuric Acid!

Typical of YCC blaming the section of York residents that can't answer back...

Never have an article that contains references to both urine and YCC!

alfie says...
1:21pm Tue 16 Mar 10

The council are laughing there c*$s off at us!!

alfie says...
1:21pm Tue 16 Mar 10

The council are laughing there c*$s off at us!!

jez b says...
1:32pm Tue 16 Mar 10

Ghost of Oscar Deutsch wrote:
Who studies this? Must be a great career choice.. 'And what do you do for a living? 'Well I study the effect of dog urine on lamp post deterioration!' I think some external consultant is having them on. What are these dogs p*issing? Sulphuric Acid! Typical of YCC blaming the section of York residents that can't answer back... Never have an article that contains references to both urine and YCC!
YCC would blame anyone they possibly could to avoid having to own up to their own uselesness.

pedalling paul says...
2:55pm Tue 16 Mar 10

All down to K9P if you ask me.....!

jez b says...
3:12pm Tue 16 Mar 10

Ann Reid does get all the glamour issues doesn't she.

LittleTed says...
4:09pm Tue 16 Mar 10

I have several dogs and I encourage them to pee on racegoers.

humpty numpty says...
5:15pm Tue 16 Mar 10

LittleTed wrote:
I have several dogs and I encourage them to pee on racegoers.
hiya Ted, i encouraged several racegoers to pee on your dogs. the "save the no entry sign" campaign needs more bursting spirited members of the public to pee on Teds dogs. form an orderly que!

LittleTed says...
5:48pm Tue 16 Mar 10

LOL!!!

Kynnersley says...
6:38pm Tue 16 Mar 10

Why not make lamp posts out of fibreglass or at least encase the bottom section in either fibreglass or plastic

old_geezer says...
6:45pm Tue 16 Mar 10

Some years ago one collapsed from base corrosion and several more were wonky along the Fulford Road riverside path. This wasn't road salt or strimmers.

As Silver says, surely to goodness any council would only buy posts designed and guaranteed to last for decades like Victorian cast iron ones? Not a Pound Shop version that keeps this year's budget down!!

Silver says...
8:10pm Tue 16 Mar 10

old_geezer wrote:
Some years ago one collapsed from base corrosion and several more were wonky along the Fulford Road riverside path. This wasn't road salt or strimmers. As Silver says, surely to goodness any council would only buy posts designed and guaranteed to last for decades like Victorian cast iron ones? Not a Pound Shop version that keeps this year's budget down!!
Its the simplicity of it, they're gonna cost you either way get something that'll last. If we made a big deal and the council said its that or dogs pee will knock them door and they last. I'd like to think we'd say oh right

uglyboy says...
9:47pm Tue 16 Mar 10

I seem to remember seeing an article years ago about this problem, I understand that there is a sleeve available to fit around lamp posts to reduce this problem.
I presume that these sleeves are still on the market.

King Edward says...
9:48pm Tue 16 Mar 10

This is the lamest excuse the council has come up with to date - the reality is years of neglecting maintenance and failing to replace has come home to roost - they might was well blame the pigeons! Anne Reid should stick to shopping at BHS and keeping them open, instead of her mouth.

evelyn_trent says...
10:58am Wed 17 Mar 10

So is it just lamp-posts? What about street signs and traffic lights?

Ghost of Oscar Deutsch says...
1:13pm Wed 17 Mar 10

King Edward, Taterville wrote
'they might was well blame the pigeons!'

Nah that's next months excuse for potholes in the road :¬)

Pigeon s*it melts tarmac!

moneyforwhat says...
1:26pm Wed 17 Mar 10

evelyn_trent wrote:
So is it just lamp-posts? What about street signs and traffic lights?
ha ha...I was hoping this would be remarked. Honestly though as to the content of this story and the many brilliant comments it has attracted - you couldn't make this up could you? What else could be contributed - there's anti-thief paint. Would rubberoid paint assist - who would measure how far up the post they would need to paint? Would it be the person who completed the other study? It's a dogs life (or the dogs b***c*s) innit?

Zebedee says...
7:41pm Mon 22 Mar 10

Shock. Horror. Whoever heard of such a thing? Dogs peeing on lamp posts. Does this only happen within the jurisdiction of CoYC? It just shows what an incompetent bunch of idiots they are. Surely CoYC knew this would happen! IDIOTS!

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree