Letters RSS Feed


A meaty issue

WE ARE being badgered by all sorts of people these days to reduce our carbon footprint and our impact on the planet, for good reason, in my view.

The UN Food and Agriculture Organisation published a 2006 report called Livestock’s Long Shadow, which found that 18 per cent of our global greenhouse gas emissions were due to meat production and processing, more than all our car and air travel together.

In response to this, an idea called “Meat-Free Monday” or “Meatout Thursday” has developed. Already, the city of Ghent in Belgium has adopted this specifically to reduce its corporate emissions.

Council-run canteens and school meals are all meat-free one day per week, and residents and businesses are encouraged to join in, with recipes and other help. The NHS has considered serving fewer meaty meals in order to cut its greenhouse footprint.

Sydney, Australia, is also encouraging residents to reduce meat consumption, and there are similar messages from celebrities such as Sheryl Crow and Paul McCartney.

I see this as more reasonable than asking people to go vegetarian, despite being one myself for 25 years. Most omnivores today enjoy veggie nosh; pasta and grain-based dishes, vegetable curries, mousaka, mixed fresh salads, even beans in a baked potato.

We’ve been told that a diet high in meat is bad for our health, and contributes to the toll of strokes, heart disease and cancer. Many people find what goes on in slaughterhouses unthinkable, so reducing our meat consumption reduces our involvement in this, as well as helping our health and the wellbeing of future generations.

City of York Council has an aim to cut its greenhouse emissions by 25 per cent by 2013, and I think reducing meat consumption by a fifth would really help this.

John Cossham, Hull Road, York.

Comments(7)

roclank2000 says...
3:54pm Tue 2 Feb 10

I like my brain, I'm very happy with it. I like its size and what it does for me.

I'd like to extend my gratitude to my early Homid ancestors for protein provided by meat.

Enjoy and celebrate meat.

petethefeet says...
6:57pm Tue 2 Feb 10

For the love of God........just about all greenhouse gases caused by agriculture are renewables. If you take his argument further the humanity, all 6 billion of us, produce tons of greenhouse gases. These 'types' even quote the noxious methane issueing from the posteriors of cows as a greenhouse gas 20 times worse than CO2. Yes it is. BUT it doesn't last long in the atmosphere. It has a half-life of 6 years.

Like Alan Titchmarsh, I don't believe the public are been given, or in most cases, have the intelligence to get their brains around all the ponderables. I just wish they wouldn't write letters to the press believinf that they know the whole picture.

Cold_as_Christmas says...
8:09pm Tue 2 Feb 10

So York City Council are going to reduce its CO2. What good will that do and more importantly; who is going to pay for it?
CO2 in the minuscule amounts currently in our atmosphere make as good as no difference to climate and there never was any proof that it ever did.
Officially, many record cold temperatures have been broken this winter, to date, but that won't stop the green machine telling you the Arctic is melting & Polar Bears are in trouble through warming.
Green taxes are wasting our cash, for how much longer?

Taken for a Mug says...
8:02am Wed 3 Feb 10

What was it that the lead author of the IPCC said......

"The fact is that we can't account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can't."

Mister Sheen says...
4:48pm Wed 3 Feb 10

"........just about all greenhouse gases caused by agriculture are renewables. " - could I call upon you to explain this further, please.

petethefeet says...
7:43pm Wed 3 Feb 10

Mister Sheen wrote:
"........just about all greenhouse gases caused by agriculture are renewables. " - could I call upon you to explain this further, please.
Coz it's something called 'organic'. Farmers grow crops, the crops absorb CO2. Either ourselves, or farm animals eat the food, absorb the energy, and release the waste as CO2 or methane via another orifice.

The cycle started 600 million years ago and is still going strong!

Mister Sheen says...
8:48pm Wed 3 Feb 10

petethefeet wrote:
Mister Sheen wrote: "........just about all greenhouse gases caused by agriculture are renewables. " - could I call upon you to explain this further, please.
Coz it's something called 'organic'. Farmers grow crops, the crops absorb CO2. Either ourselves, or farm animals eat the food, absorb the energy, and release the waste as CO2 or methane via another orifice. The cycle started 600 million years ago and is still going strong!
Simplistically, yes. This is indeed a sub-section of the carbon cycle which would have been seen in a pre-industrial age where fields were tended by human or horse and without the use artificial fertilisers or pesticides. Modern-day industrial agriculture uses these very fossil fuel-consumptive (and therefore carbon dioxide emissive) chemicals and even organic farming relies heavily on mechanical tractor power which run on fossil fuel power also. Many greenhouse production plants in the Netherlands use artificial heat and light to grow crops, burning thousands of tonnes of natural gas each year. Then there's the carbon emissions of transporting the produce, sometimes thousands of miles around the world! It's estimated that each calorie of food energy requires somewhere between ten and eighty calories of fossil fuel energy to grow and get onto our plates. This ratio is even higher for meat and dairy production as animals eat grain-based foodstuffs (as well as grass) and withdraw a great deal of it's energy in order to live, itself. If we all grew/raised our own food on allotments, your statement would hold water but the vast majority is grown on an industrial scale.

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree