Here are further points to raise (From York Press)
Get in touch: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting YORK to 80360 or send an email»
Here are further points to raise
9:40am Wednesday 13th March 2013 in Letters By Reader's letter
My MP, Julian Sturdy, focused his latest column (ThePress, March 8) on City of York Council. After disdaining to score points against a non-Tory council, he spent eight paragraphs doing precisely that, urging us finally to ‘monitor’ our councillors’ decisions and their impact.
He highlighted tough council decisions affecting his fairly prosperous constituents in York Outer – on council tax, parking, recycling – but said nothing about tougher decisions by the Government he supports, which impact far more harshly on poorer households in central York and throughout Britain.
Tell us now, Mr Sturdy, what you think about near eight per cent unemployment; “work experience” that omits the experience of being paid; faulty work assessments of disabled people; the one per cent cap on benefit increases, which will push 200,000 children into poverty; the “bedroom tax” threatening innocent people with eviction.
Tell us how you feel when your government removes small but precious sums from poor families, while letting billions disappear into banks, PFI companies and tax-dodging corporations; and while squandering further astronomical amounts on subsidising low-pay employers, cutting the 50 per cent tax rate, needless NHS restructuring and serial foreign wars.
Then, with two years left before the general election, we can begin to monitor you.
John Heawood, Eastward Avenue, Fulford, York.
Comments(2)
George Appleby
says...
10:40am Thu 14 Mar 13
Sorry Julian but you must have some doubts about this which keep you awake at night.
Scarlet Pimpernel says...
3:43pm Wed 13 Mar 13
The Annual Monitoring Report for 2011/12 has just put on CYC's website, but, is missing key information:-
1. No planning permissions for housing given.
2. No unimplemented planning permissions given.
3. No housing trajectory for predicted completions given.
Why is this key information missing ?
Isn't the truth, that the numbers give the game away ? The numbers are so bad, that they daren't publish them, and they won't do the trajectory because if done honestly, it will show that they can't hit the targets.
Those responsible for this deficient and unacceptable report better have some answers, or, they will be down the road with the rest of the culprits who are lying and cheating on the scale of the housing problem the Council has created.