Tax freeze dilemma

IN RESPONSE to Denis Barton’s letter of February 16 and indeed Chris Steward’s reply of February 19, the council tax freeze is funded by a government grant. For the past two years, this has been equivalent to a 2.5 per cent increase in council tax. However, in 2013-14 the £1.8 million grant will only be the same as a one per cent increase.

At some point, this funding will be withdrawn, so councils which have repeatedly frozen council tax may find themselves having to impose double-digit rises to make up the shortfall. According to a survey carried out by the Local Government Chronicle, around 25 per cent of councils are intending to reject the grant and raise council tax in 2013-14. In political terms, 22 per cent of Conservative authorities have plans to increase council tax compared with 32 per cent of Labour councils and 17 per cent controlled by Lib Dems.

Unitary authorities such as York (39 per cent) are most likely to raise council tax; only 11 per cent of county councils, which face local elections in May, are proposing to do the same.

Last year, the same survey quoted the finance director of a Conservative-controlled council on the decision to accept the grant: “Financially it makes no sense, but politically members feel they’ve no choice.”

Dr J Watkinson, Pulleyn Drive, York.

Comments(2)

Mulgrave says...
12:17pm Thu 21 Feb 13

With or without the grant Council tax will be a good few % points higher in say 4 years time. The question is whether the payer is better off with no increase for three years and then a hefty rise in year 4, or increases each year leading to that same level in year 4. I think most payers can work this out for themselves, to be fair though many would accept the freeze and then 'forget' they were warned about the impending jump.

Maquis says...
3:06pm Thu 21 Feb 13

The idea of the grant is to allow the council time to make the savings, not as an alternative to making the savings.

They could maybe take the time to ensure that items which need to be replaced can be done so with low energy versions, leading to savings in the following years, or the time to renegotiate contracts with outside suppliers which will be falling due, to save some money them in future years.

Unfortunately this council as usual stick their head into the sand, spend on whatever they want, but cut the most visible and painful areas such as help for the vulnerable, after all this is something they can blame the government for.

Genuine sensible and viable savings seem to be beyond the intellect of this council.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree