Where you live in York can determine health and wellbeing

PEOPLE living in poorer areas of York have a lower life expectancy and poorer health than those in more well-off wards, according to a major report on the city’s wellbeing.

Men living in deprived areas of the city live, on average, ten years less than those in better-off areas, according to the Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA).

The life expectancy gap between females was an average of 3.6 years.

Westfield, Clifton, Heworth, Guildhall and Hull Road were singled out as the most deprived areas of York in the 100-page report, which also said residents of the wards were also much more likely to die from lung cancer and circulatory conditions such as heart disease and stroke.

Those living in the Westfield, Heworth and Clifton wards were also at the highest risk of suffering domestic violence, according to the JSNA.

While the city has enjoyed overall improvements in terms of life expectancy and falling death rates from cancer, the report singles out York’s ageing population as an area likely to have an impact on future NHS budgets in the city.

The task of assessing the findings of the third JSNA will fall on the city’s Shadow Health and Wellbeing Board - the organisation which will be responsible for forming the city’s health policies and strategy, from April next year.

Coun Tracey Simpson-Laing said the report would be one of the “key pieces of evidence” used to inform the board.

“The Shadow Health and Wellbeing Board will consider the findings in addition to other evidence to decide the priorities to take forward to improve public health across the city. This includes looking at early intervention and preventative measures alongside treatment.”

Jane Perger, vice chair of health watchdog York LINk, and a member of the shadow board, said: “We’ll be continuing to work with our partners over the coming year to help reduce the health inequalities highlighted.”

The report recommends the continued focus on prevention and early intervention as way of maintaining the rise in life expectancy and falling death rates enjoyed in the city.

Rachel Johns, associate director of Public Health, said: “Intervening early is a good idea for individuals and may also reduce costs. This can include supporting people to change their behaviour as well as designing services so that people avoid the need for hospital services.”

Comments(12)

razor08 says...
9:40am Fri 4 May 12

'PEOPLE living in poorer areas of York have a lower life expectancy and poorer health than those in more well-off wards, according to a major report on the city’s wellbeing'.

Specialist subject; stating the bleeding obvious. How much public money was wasted creating this report

xumps says...
10:25am Fri 4 May 12

Might I suggest 'life style' rather than 'location' has more bearing?

Geoffers says...
11:21am Fri 4 May 12

xumps wrote:
Might I suggest 'life style' rather than 'location' has more bearing?
Ditto!

cynic3 says...
11:48am Fri 4 May 12

Oh god has someone paid for this? Brings back my university studies of 30 years ago, hardly ground braking!

Theendoftheworld says...
1:55pm Fri 4 May 12

If I lived in some of the places mentioned I wouldn't want to live longer.

MrsDingledongle says...
4:11pm Fri 4 May 12

When did Tang Hall become Heworth?

Older Sometimes Wiser says...
5:05pm Fri 4 May 12

razor08 wrote:
'PEOPLE living in poorer areas of York have a lower life expectancy and poorer health than those in more well-off wards, according to a major report on the city’s wellbeing'.

Specialist subject; stating the bleeding obvious. How much public money was wasted creating this report
Read the full detailed report or the exec summary ( link from CoY Webpages), and you may find it both interesting and informative. It provides the sort of evidence any Council requires to make good decisions, surely something we need in York?

TheYorkRose says...
6:03pm Fri 4 May 12

Umm, guys? There was 100 pages of this, and it's slightly more in depth. Instead of attacking the report, why not attack the pointless journalism that doesn't dive deeper than the ten word summary??

wildthing666 says...
6:17pm Fri 4 May 12

TheYorkRose wrote:
Umm, guys? There was 100 pages of this, and it's slightly more in depth. Instead of attacking the report, why not attack the pointless journalism that doesn't dive deeper than the ten word summary??
That's correct Journalist means 10 words and they know everything on a subject.

monkeyhanger says...
7:09pm Fri 4 May 12

I promise that Heworth is no way a deprived area,in fact the recent article in Yorkshire Life magazine sang it praises and it reminds me a little of St Johns Wood(London).I can only assume the Heworth ward for elections takes in Tang Hall,hence the Labour Councillors.Tang Hall is mostly OK now,lots of students and generally decent folk.

monkeyhanger says...
7:09pm Fri 4 May 12

I promise that Heworth is no way a deprived area,in fact the recent article in Yorkshire Life magazine sang it praises and it reminds me a little of St Johns Wood(London).I can only assume the Heworth ward for elections takes in Tang Hall,hence the Labour Councillors.Tang Hall is mostly OK now,lots of students and generally decent folk.

Sawday2 says...
8:22pm Fri 4 May 12

razor08 wrote:
'PEOPLE living in poorer areas of York have a lower life expectancy and poorer health than those in more well-off wards, according to a major report on the city’s wellbeing'.

Specialist subject; stating the bleeding obvious. How much public money was wasted creating this report
You took the words straight out of my keyboard!

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree