City of York Council unveils transport schemes wish list

York Press: Coun Dave Merrett at the Queen’s Street Bridge Coun Dave Merrett at the Queen’s Street Bridge

Transport bosses in York today unveil a wish list of major transport schemes to reduce congestion and improve public transport in the city. And they want the people of York to have a say. STEPHEN LEWIS reports.

TRANSPORT bosses in York have not given up on the hope of one day dualling at least part of the city’s northern ring road – even though it could cost up to £150 million.

The proposal is one of the items included on a wish list of schemes to improve transport in York over the next ten to 20 years unveiled by council bosses in an exclusive meeting with The Press.

Other items – which the council describes as ‘aspirations’ – on the list include a Haxby railway station; improvements to bus services, including the possibility of introducing electric buses; a freight depot on the edge of town to reduce the number of delivery vehicles in the city centre, and a new Park&Ride at Clifton Moor .

Also on the list is a scheme to demolish the Queen Street bridge and build a bus interchange beneath – as revealed in The Press earlier this month.

Transport bosses in the city accept there is no way the council could fund any of these schemes itself. They will only be able to push ahead with any of the items on their list with significant central government funding, as well as investment from business.

Four years ago, dualling the outer ring road was ruled out as a possibility on the grounds of cost. It was estimated it could cost up to £264 million.

Plans for a proposed £4.5 million railway station at Haxby were also put on hold in 2010 because of uncertainty surrounding central government funding.

But the funding goalposts have changed since then, said Coun Dave Merrett , the city council’s cabinet member for transport, planning and sustainability.

Decisions on awarding central government funds for major transport projects are to be devolved to regional decision-makers, he said, giving York more of a chance to make its case.

Funding decisions will also be based more on the potential that transport schemes have for promoting economic growth, which should give York a better chance. And the city becoming part of the wider Leeds City Region group of local authorities will also increase its chances of securing government funds.

The city council is also likely to need to use ‘planning gain’ (ie contributions to major public projects by developers) and to earmark some of the income from business rates (possible in future under a new arrangement known as ‘earn back’) to move forward.

Even so, council bosses accept there is almost certainly no way they will be able to achieve all the aspirations revealed today.

Coun Merrett said it was vital the council had a strategy and a clear idea of what it would like to achieve, however, so that it could take advantage of any funding opportunities that came up.

That is why the authority has today launched a public debate on what the city’s transport priorities should be – and which items on the list the people of York think most worth pursuing.

“We want people to be aware that there is a long-term strategy,” said Richard Wood, the council’s assistant director for planning and transport.

“But this is a long list. We will have to prioritise. So this is an opportunity for people to give us their views about what they see as being the key transport priorities.”

The long list includes eight schemes or transport aims. They aren’t all separate, stressed Neil Taylor, the council’s interim director of city and environmental services. Many are interconnected, like a jigsaw, and it may be possible to progress certain schemes bit by bit so progress is made in ‘bite-sized chunks’.


Here is the wish list in full:

 

Bus/rail interchange

As reported in The Press earlier this month, this would involve demolishing the Queen Street Bridge near the railway station, and creating a bus/rail interchange on the land below.

Passengers emerging from the station would have to walk only short distances to catch buses to most destinations in York. The scheme would also involve relocation of station parking and a new multi-storey car park, as well as a footway linking the station with the York Central site behind.

Estimated cost: in the region of £15 million to £30 million.

 

Public transport improvements

A range of possible improvements to public transport in York, including:

• New bus priority lanes to speed up bus journeys and increase punctuality

• Bus fare reductions and ticketing improvements in negotiation with bus operators

• Better information about bus times and connections, along the lines of the i-Travel scheme to encourage more bus use that will be launched tomorrow

• Improvements to bus fleets

• Possibility of electric buses to reduced noise and pollution.

Estimated cost of improvements: anything from a few million pounds to £60 million, depending on what changes are made

 

Haxby railway station

Two years ago, work on proposals for a £4.5 million railway station in Haxby were put on hold because of the uncertainty over government funding. But the scheme is firmly back on the council’s transport wish list.

It would offer a perfect way into work for people from the north of the city – especially if a business district was to be built on the York Central site just behind York railway station, said Neil Taylor.

It would also provide a real alternative to the car for those looking to come into the city from the northern suburbs for other purposes, he added – especially if the bus/ rail interchange beneath what is now the Queen Street bridge became a reality.

Estimated cost: £5 million to £10 million

 

New roads into York Central If the potential of the massive York Central site behind the railway station is to be unlocked, there will need to be at least one major new road leading into it.

There are two most obvious options for such a road; via a bridge from Holgate ; or from the business park where CPP is based.

Either would help make the redevelopment of the huge site possible, with much-needed new housing, leisure facilities, and a new business district that could bring many jobs to York.

Estimated cost: £15 million to £30 million.

 

A19 bus lane and improvements to access at the Naburn

Naburn is the least successful of the city’s ring of existing Park & Ride sites, said Coun Merrett.

Improvements would include bus priority lanes on the stretch of the A19 approaching the Park & ride site from Escrick , as well as improved access to the Park&Ride site itself.

Estimated cost: less than £5 million

 

A new Clifton Moor Park&Ride

New Park & Ride at Clifton Moor, together with improvements to Wigginton Road to accommodate Park & Ride buses.

The new service would call at York Hospital , as well as serving the Clifton Moor shops, said Coun Dave Merrett, the council’s cabinet member for transport, planning and sustainability.

Estimated cost: in the region of £7million to £8 million.

 

Outer ring road improvements

Three possible levels of improvement:

Low intervention: improvement to junctions on the stretch of the northern outer ring road between the A59 and Monks Cross, to reduce congestion, improve ring road journey times and encourage more traffic to bypass the city centre. Estimated journey time savings of four to six minutes. Estimated cost: £30 million to £40 million.

Medium intervention: dual the northern outer ring road between the A59 and the A19. This would involve building an additional bridge over the River Ouse to run parallel to the existing A1237 bridge. Each bridge would carry traffic in one direction only. Estimated journey time savings of eight to nine minutes. Estimated cost: £50 million to £100 million

High intervention: dual the northern ring road between the A59 and Monks Cross. This would involve an additional bridge over the Ouse, and three new flyovers or underpasses: one each at the A59 and A19 junctions, and a third at the Great North Way/Millfield Lane roundabout.

Estimated journey time savings: eight 11 minutes.

Estimated cost: in the region of £100 million to £150 million

 

Freight consolidation

The council is already looking into how the number of delivery lorries and vans coming into the city centre can be reduced.

Consultations are ongoing with businesses, the universities, the hospital, and freight operators to look at delivery patterns, and to see if more efficient ways can be devised of bringing goods and deliveries into York.

A much-talked-about freight hub somewhere on the edge of the city may be one way of reducing congestion from delivery vans: but better coordination of deliveries may also help, said Richard Wood.

Estimated cost of producing a plan for more efficient deliveries, and for assessing the potential of an out-of-town freight hub: uncertain at this stage.

 

Aims: boost business and reduce congestion

THE same basic aims underlie all the proposals on the council’s transport wish list, says Coun Dave Merrett. T

hey are to:

• Boost business and economic growth (thus creating jobs), by providing the Transport infrastructure that will make it possible for businesses to grow, or encourage them to relocate here from elsewhere

• Reduce congestion, so cutting travel times and making York a more pleasant place to live and work

• Encourage more people to cycle and walk by reducing the dominance of the car – thus improving health

• Reducing air pollution caused by traffic fumes. Certain parts of the city centre and Fishergate are in breach of European air quality limits designed to protect us from the effects of long-term airborne pollution, for example by nitrogen dioxide.

The Rougier Street/ George Hudson Street area is even worse. Nitrogen dioxide levels are so high here that, for those with conditions such as asthma, there is an immediate risk of health problems. Nitrogen dioxide inflames the lining of the lungs, and can cause breathing problems – especially among people with asthma – as well as increasing the likelihood of developing colds, flu and bronchitis

• Reducing carbon emissions and therefore York’s contribution to global warming.

If you have strong views on any of the proposals outlined above, or on which of them should be top priorities, you can let the council know by means of a dedicated new email address that has been set up especially. Just email your ideas to: futuretransport@york.gov.uk

Comments (15)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

11:38am Mon 17 Sep 12

meme says...

I love this article!
I have a wishlist and one is to win the euro millions but like most of these ideas there is no hope of doing so!
It wil be a miracle if they can secure access to York central at an affordable cost and YC is the foundation stone on which the entire LDF numbers was based ie 1million ft of offices 3000 new homes, a transport interchange and 250,000 sq ft of retail
Thes people are living in a fantasy world. And they suggest they want money off develpers to fund part of it!!
What developers? Have they not noticed there is hardly anyone building and those that are are hard pressed enough as it is. Where ar ethey suppoosed to find the money from combined with affordable housing/public open space/educational agreements etc?
Its time this Labour party started facing reality and not living in cloud cuckoo land and eliverd things which will happen and benefit york citizens now, not in 50 years time!
I love this article! I have a wishlist and one is to win the euro millions but like most of these ideas there is no hope of doing so! It wil be a miracle if they can secure access to York central at an affordable cost and YC is the foundation stone on which the entire LDF [now gone but will b replaced with similar sites] numbers was based ie 1million ft of offices 3000 new homes, a transport interchange and 250,000 sq ft of retail [now they have consented Monks Cross that has no chance of getting off the ground!] Thes people are living in a fantasy world. And they suggest they want money off develpers to fund part of it!! What developers? Have they not noticed there is hardly anyone building and those that are are hard pressed enough as it is. Where ar ethey suppoosed to find the money from combined with affordable housing/public open space/educational agreements etc? Its time this Labour party started facing reality and not living in cloud cuckoo land and eliverd things which will happen and benefit york citizens now, not in 50 years time! meme

1:31pm Mon 17 Sep 12

John Cossham says...

I'll be voting for the Haxby station, the bus-rail interchange and the access to York Central.... but why not combine the station/Queen St. improvements with the York Central access?

I like the idea of 'freight consolidation' but I'd need to know more about the plans before I supported it. And as for the public transport improvements, I don't think the plans as described go far enough. I'd like the Council to explore the idea of a light rail (tram) system, or even something more advanced. An advanced tram or other low carbon mass transit system could connect York Central and the Poppleton Park and Ride with the station and the centre.
I'll be voting for the Haxby station, the bus-rail interchange and the access to York Central.... but why not combine the station/Queen St. improvements with the York Central access? I like the idea of 'freight consolidation' but I'd need to know more about the plans before I supported it. And as for the public transport improvements, I don't think the plans as described go far enough. I'd like the Council to explore the idea of a light rail (tram) system, or even something more advanced. An advanced tram or other low carbon mass transit system could connect York Central and the Poppleton Park and Ride with the station and the centre. John Cossham

3:32pm Mon 17 Sep 12

scooterboy says...

monorail system arround the city to and from monks cross and the designer outlet, free to use, no trafic within the city walls from 9am to 6pm end of problem
monorail system arround the city to and from monks cross and the designer outlet, free to use, no trafic within the city walls from 9am to 6pm end of problem scooterboy

5:08pm Mon 17 Sep 12

Silver says...

Can we have democracy back? It's not gonna happen so deserves to be on a wish list
Can we have democracy back? It's not gonna happen so deserves to be on a wish list Silver

6:14pm Mon 17 Sep 12

AnotherPointofView says...

If the Council do want to hear our views, can we have a link please?
If the Council do want to hear our views, can we have a link please? AnotherPointofView

6:50pm Mon 17 Sep 12

Reverend J says...

But- How will one get in to the railway institute if one knocks down the bridge!
But- How will one get in to the railway institute if one knocks down the bridge! Reverend J

7:04pm Mon 17 Sep 12

ouseswimmer says...

They should knock that wall down. It gets in the way.
They should knock that wall down. It gets in the way. ouseswimmer

8:03pm Mon 17 Sep 12

Monty_G says...

How's about they do some more straightforwards things to improve traffic. Ive travelled into york on the a19 from selby for 8 years and the most ridiculous thing York City council ever did is put lights at Crockey Hill. the A19 south has to be one of the countries only arterial routes that backs up into the city at rush hour; its ridiculous. Crawling along, fumes polluting the atmosphere and get down to the lights and 1 or sometimes even 2 !! cars pull out from the road to Wheldrake, its madness. They should be ripped out straight away and overnight the a19 will clear up. At its worst it cause traffic to back up right down the a19 into fulford and also causes long queues on the exit slip roads on the a64...all for 3 cars... They should be taken down as they only add to pollution, congestion and frustration. I and several others i know, have sometimes opted to take the a162 which is some 6 miles further but doesnt involve sitting in a queue, into or out of york. Next on the list the Naburn road junction to the a19. partly due to the massive queues on the a19 many take the shortcut to naburn and filter onto the a19 that way. the main problem with this is that it holds traffic up entering york as people are too polite. there should be lights on that junction. You only have to sit in the queue and watch the long line of cars be let out one after another while everyone coming from the a64 roundabout has to sit and wait. Sorting those two out will probably cost nothing if they move the lights from crockey hill to the naburn road junction I'll do it !
How's about they do some more straightforwards things to improve traffic. Ive travelled into york on the a19 from selby for 8 years and the most ridiculous thing York City council ever did is put lights at Crockey Hill. the A19 south has to be one of the countries only arterial routes that backs up into the city at rush hour; its ridiculous. Crawling along, fumes polluting the atmosphere and get down to the lights and 1 or sometimes even 2 !! cars pull out from the road to Wheldrake, its madness. They should be ripped out straight away and overnight the a19 will clear up. At its worst it cause traffic to back up right down the a19 into fulford and also causes long queues on the exit slip roads on the a64...all for 3 cars... They should be taken down as they only add to pollution, congestion and frustration. I and several others i know, have sometimes opted to take the a162 which is some 6 miles further but doesnt involve sitting in a queue, into or out of york. Next on the list the Naburn road junction to the a19. partly due to the massive queues on the a19 many take the shortcut to naburn and filter onto the a19 that way. the main problem with this is that it holds traffic up entering york as people are too polite. there should be lights on that junction. You only have to sit in the queue and watch the long line of cars be let out one after another while everyone coming from the a64 roundabout has to sit and wait. Sorting those two out will probably cost nothing if they move the lights from crockey hill to the naburn road junction I'll do it ! Monty_G

8:56pm Mon 17 Sep 12

Buzz Light-year says...

I'm not down with Coun Merrett's politics or his policies but I like to a see a good 'tache worn with pride.
Genuinely.

Maybe he would better serve us as cabinet member for facial hair?
I'm not down with Coun Merrett's politics or his policies but I like to a see a good 'tache worn with pride. Genuinely. Maybe he would better serve us as cabinet member for facial hair? Buzz Light-year

8:58pm Mon 17 Sep 12

David of York says...

You just know that the only thing the council will manage is new bus lanes...
You just know that the only thing the council will manage is new bus lanes... David of York

10:36pm Mon 17 Sep 12

goatman says...

Inner 'Ring Road' to be one way. Tell the planners to stop playing with models and use their Mk1 eyeballs. A one way system would reduce traffic signal delays, congestion (which would reduce air pollution), and give space for a dedicated bus/cycle lane. York is small enough that such a one way system would not add significant delays to round town journeys, the benefits would far outweigh the cons.
Inner 'Ring Road' to be one way. Tell the planners to stop playing with models and use their Mk1 eyeballs. A one way system would reduce traffic signal delays, congestion (which would reduce air pollution), and give space for a dedicated bus/cycle lane. York is small enough that such a one way system would not add significant delays to round town journeys, the benefits would far outweigh the cons. goatman

9:39am Tue 18 Sep 12

roskoboskovic says...

as long as merrett is in charge we ve not no chance of improving our transport infrastructure.the bloke is an idiot.someone decided that a bus lane was a good idea between the first fulford interchange and before naburn lane,less than a hundred yards,total waste of money and effort.
as long as merrett is in charge we ve not no chance of improving our transport infrastructure.the bloke is an idiot.someone decided that a bus lane was a good idea between the first fulford interchange and before naburn lane,less than a hundred yards,total waste of money and effort. roskoboskovic

12:25pm Tue 18 Sep 12

rogue84 says...

bus lanes?? where are they going to go?! i'm in favour of dualling the northern side of the ring-road, 100%. it should have been done in the first place and (apologies for bringing this up) with the new development at monks cross, the upgrade of this area of York's roads is absolutely vital.
bus lanes?? where are they going to go?! i'm in favour of dualling the northern side of the ring-road, 100%. it should have been done in the first place and (apologies for bringing this up) with the new development at monks cross, the upgrade of this area of York's roads is absolutely vital. rogue84

10:29am Thu 20 Sep 12

ChrisM2010 says...

None of this will happen because the people in charge of York are obviously anti-resident and anti-car.

It's all about the frigging students and tourists! Well remember who bloody lives here when the students and tourists feck off home!
None of this will happen because the people in charge of York are obviously anti-resident and anti-car. It's all about the frigging students and tourists! Well remember who bloody lives here when the students and tourists feck off home! ChrisM2010

11:32pm Wed 26 Sep 12

ZachCohen says...

If anyone drives along the A1237 they will know the issues are between the A59 junction and the Haxby Junction. After to Huntington there are no/ few issues with standing traffic.
There is no point dueling between A59 and A19 as this will cause congestion between Clifton Moor and New Earswick.

A better option would be to put in a link road between Wigginton road and Haxby Road that links into Water Lane/ Clifton Green. The majority of motorists are trying to get from Acomb to Huntington/Haxby/New Earswick area or vise versa and the only three routes are A1237, through town via Gillygate or through Clifton onto Crichton Bridge.
If another route was added though clifton linking up through Rowntrees then this would create a Fourth route and reduce traffic on the other Three. Which as York residents know can be some of the worst hotpots during rush hour traffic.

Combine this with a station at Haxby and a Park and ride train station somewhere between Poppleton and Hessay the congestion will be much less on the A1237. This would possibly negate the need to dual the A1237 at all, although If they can put a 2nd bridge over the ouse between A59 and A19 this would help if the A1 is shut. (we all remember those days!)

Also link road from CPP to Leeman road with any development along it. Paid for by developers/ 2nd Campus in a different part of the city sparking growth round there. Leeman Road area is sooooo suited for students (oh wait they built that on green land, such a shame!)
If anyone drives along the A1237 they will know the issues are between the A59 junction and the Haxby Junction. After to Huntington there are no/ few issues with standing traffic. There is no point dueling between A59 and A19 as this will cause congestion between Clifton Moor and New Earswick. A better option would be to put in a link road between Wigginton road and Haxby Road that links into Water Lane/ Clifton Green. The majority of motorists are trying to get from Acomb to Huntington/Haxby/New Earswick area or vise versa and the only three routes are A1237, through town via Gillygate or through Clifton onto Crichton Bridge. If another route was added though clifton linking up through Rowntrees then this would create a Fourth route and reduce traffic on the other Three. Which as York residents know can be some of the worst hotpots during rush hour traffic. Combine this with a station at Haxby and a Park and ride train station somewhere between Poppleton and Hessay the congestion will be much less on the A1237. This would possibly negate the need to dual the A1237 at all, although If they can put a 2nd bridge over the ouse between A59 and A19 this would help if the A1 is shut. (we all remember those days!) Also link road from CPP to Leeman road with any development along it. Paid for by developers/ 2nd Campus in a different part of the city sparking growth round there. Leeman Road area is sooooo suited for students (oh wait they built that on green land, such a shame!) ZachCohen

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree