IT seems that the Israeli government is playing yet again into the hands of not only the extremists within its own ranks but also is playing into the hands of organisations like Hamas. In an ''assassination'' attempt on Abdel-Aziz al-Rantissi they created more ''martyrs''. In reality innocent civilians were killed by trigger-happy soldiers. Six missiles were fired into the area. The first missile missed its target. Afterwards five more were fired killing a 24-year-old woman and an eight-year-old girl. A Palestinian medical relief clinic was also hit as was a centre for the disabled.
One wonders (since this fits a certain pattern) if Ariel Sharon is deliberately trying to tear up the road map for peace by provoking a response from Palestinian terrorist groups. This would allow him to placate extremists in his own ranks and at the same time not only retain seized land but also seize some more. And before anybody complains that those who oppose such extra-judicial killings (which are contrary to a whole raft of international conventions) are giving succour to terrorists, consider this: Israel claims to be the only truly democratic nation in the Middle East, the only nation that upholds the rule of law.
Surely Israel should be taking the legal and moral high-ground here if it were truly a democratic nation that respected law and human rights. Surely it would be better to capture these people and bring them to trial rather than killing them while at the same time killing innocent Palestinian civilians. We don't expect any better from the terrorists who don't care about who they kill. We do have the right to expect better from a nation that claims to respect law and order. We need to call the government of Ariel Sharon to account.
Rev John Nugent,
5 Charles Street, Annan.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article